When Glass Ceilings Meet Glass Walls

 photo credit:  vauvau ,  CC by 2.0

photo credit: vauvau, CC by 2.0

Megan Smith grew up around engineers. Her grandfather helped build roads and bridges throughout the early 20th century and contributed to large portions of the transportation system in Indiana. Yet, when the young Smith enrolled at MIT in the early 1980s to study mechanical engineering, the question her grandfather asked her mother was, “Well, why would she want to do that?”i

Smith, now the Vice President of Google X, the arm of Google responsible for innovations like the driverless car, Google Glass, and Project Loon, shares the vignette to add color to one of the many unconscious biases individuals bring into the tech ecosystem. “We inherit the weight of history, of inherent bias. First, there was conscious bias, now there is unconscious bias. Just things your brain fills in… It’s no one’s fault — it’s not like anyone is actively doing this. It’s just that we inherit it; we have it; it’s systemic. So we need to become highly educated… Once you know that, then you can act differently.”ii

In Silicon Valley, gender disparities permeate every tier of participation, from entry-level programmers to executive-level positions, from initial pitch competitors to early-stage investors, from Hackathon participants to conference speakers. While many claim it’s a pipeline problem — women earned only 18% of the computer science (CS) degrees in the United States in 2008iii — further analysis finds a lengthy negative feedback loop compounding these inequalities throughout the entire cycle. For example, just a year before Smith graduated from MIT in 1986, 37 percent of computer science graduates in the United States were female; by 2008, this number had dropped to 18 percent. In 1991, women held 37 percent of all computing-related occupations; by 2012, this number was 26 percent.iv What is happening in the tech ecosystem, what is driving it, and what can we do to collectively address it?

 

Debugging the Data

Women are woefully underrepresented within the technical side of the sector, comprising only:

  • 2 percent of open source developers;v

  • 6 percent of mobile application developers;vi

  • 23 percent of programmers;vii

These percentages extend to the founding and investing of companies as well, where women hold just:

  • 5 percent of technology company founders; viii

  • 11 percent of venture capitalistsix

  • 22 percent of angel investors;x

Why are these numbers so low and where do they begin?

According to the National Center for Women & Information Technology (NCWIT), a collective of more than 250 affiliates aimed at increasing the number of girls and underrepresented groups in computer sciences, the average girl gains access to computers at age 14.5, while the average boy does so at age 12.xi Furthermore, girls are more likely to first own a computer at age 19, much later than the average of 15 for boys.xii However, it is more than access and ownership that is affecting girls’ interest in computer science; it is also social constraints.

Young girls lack prominent technical role models in everything from children’s books to toys to media. A study from the Journal of Educational Computing Research found that by high school, boys have “much more sex-stereotypical attitudes to computing than girls.” This, compounded with more experience in computing, means that, “girls not only have to deal with being a minority in computing classes [in high school], but they also face a majority of students who believe men do computing better than women.”xiii The study further asserts that when “women are encouraged by role models or a mentor, they… are more motivated to study computing.”xiv It appears that female mentors and positive imagery, along with encouragement from parents and teachers, are essential for girls to continue studying computer science. Yet, prominent female computer scientists are difficult to find in the American mainstream media. “Technical women remain largely invisible and behind the scenes despite important and often elite contributions,” says Smith.xv Programming heroines like Ada Lovelace, Grace Hopper, Anita Borg, and the ENIAC Programmers remain largely unknown outside the tech community.xvi

However, images of women in media are beginning to change. Nonprofits like Miss Representation and the Geena Davis Institute on Gender in Media aim to improve the portrayal of women and girls. In addition, a recent partnership between Getty Images and Leanin.org, the foundation established by Facebook CFO Sheryl Sandberg, aims to empower women through increased imagery in traditionally male-dominated professions.xvii “When we see images of women and girls and men, they often fall into the stereotypes that we’re trying to overcome, and you can’t be what you can’t see,” says Sandberg.xviii Yet, even with increased positive imagery, current norms leave many young girls and boys unable to list even a single female computer scientist.

 

The 0.3 Percent

 photo credit:  oh_you ,  CC by 2.0

photo credit: oh_you, CC by 2.0

For the young women who defy these stereotypes and go on to pursue computer science and engineering degrees, the classroom presents another challenge. In the United States, only 0.3 percent of females list computer science as their intended major upon entering college.xix When beginning their first computer science course, young girls find themselves outnumbered and report feeling the need to prove themselves or endure sexist remarks from male classmates or professors.xx They describe struggling silently alongside male peers who, often enjoying more support from their families and society, have spent summers attending coding camps or hours working on side projects.xxi Yet, when universities revamp their curriculum, positive trends emerge. In 2006, Harvey Mudd College, an elite math, science, and engineering university, conducted extensive research to determine how to attract more female CS students. Its findings encouraged the University to adopt a three-prong approach that overhauled its CS curricula.xxii The result? By 2010, female representation in computer science went from 10 percent of the class to almost 50 percent.xxiii While Harvey Mudd College may naturally attract more young women interested in science, engineering, and technology (SET), the basic reform strategies of tailoring incoming CS courses to student backgrounds, increasing collaborative projects, and updating its programming curricula should be noted by other universities across the country.

Increasing the number of women and girls that pursue degrees in SET is not the only challenge, however. Once in the profession, women leave these fields at almost twice the rate of men — over 52 percent leave the profession — with the attrition rate spiking 10 years into their career.xxiv The 2008 study, The Athena Factor: Reversing the Brain Drain in Science, Engineering, and Technology, found the top five reasons women left their professions were due to “unconscious bias, isolation, supervisory relationships, [unclear] promotion processes, and competing life responsibilities.”xxv Women reported feeling isolated as the only female and often “stuck” in positions with unclear promotional paths. One reason for this is the lack of female mentors and (often male) sponsors.

A man is 46 percent more likely to have a sponsor than a woman.

While a mentor can provide guidance and feedback, a sponsor is usually a senior person within the organization who will advocate for the individual and potentially risk his or her reputation on the person’s performance. At least 45 percent of the women in the study lacked formal mentors and more than 80 percent lacked sponsors.xxvi However, the masculine culture itself often prevents male-female sponsorship, especially amongst younger women. Recent findings from The Sponsor Effect: Breaking Through the Last Glass Ceiling finds, “the majority of senior men (64 percent) at the level of vice president and above are reluctant to have a one-on-one meeting with junior women — and half of junior women likewise avoid seeking out such contact.”xxvii Overall, the perception of an illicit romance is enough to keep both parties distant, which also means that a man is 46 percent more likely to have a sponsor than a woman.xxviii

 

When Glass Ceilings Meet Glass Walls

While issues of representation, unconscious bias, and engrained culture might perpetuate the glass ceiling, several other constraints appear to be impacting women’s technological trajectory.

According to the Kauffman Foundation, many high-growth firms — the ones creating the most jobs and generating the highest revenues — are startups in science and technology. While women comprise 35 percent of startup founders, they account for only about 5 percent of technology startups.xxix Why is this?

Most research agrees that, at least in the sciences, the pipeline is not the issue. According to the report Overcoming the Gender Gap: Women Entrepreneurs As Economic Drivers, “[Women] have earned 60 percent of the bachelor’s degrees in the biological sciences, 41 percent of those in the physical sciences, and 35 percent in chemical engineering.”xxx One argument, according to the Kauffman Foundation, is that, “What it takes to succeed in business is not necessarily the same as what it takes to succeed in starting a business. While women have made great strides in breaking through the proverbial ‘glass ceiling’ to advance to high rank within corporations, few have made similar strides in breaking out laterally — through what might be called the ‘glass walls’ — to start their own high-growth firms.”xxxi This could be the desire to take academic leave from leading institutions to found high-growth companies or leaving high-profile positions within a firm “to start something big.” xxxii

Furthermore, a breakthrough study entitled Gender Difference in Patenting in the Academic Life Sciences followed more than 4,000 life science researchers for a 30-year period and found several prominent trends. First, women patent their research at about 40 percent the rate of men, which presents, “a very significant narrowing of the field at one of the first major steps along the road to creating a startup company from one’s research.”xxxiii Secondly, of the women in the study, only 6.5 percent were on the science advisory board of a high-tech company, compared to more than 93 percent of the men.xxxiv What this implies is that “women were less likely to have the connections — or make the connections — that can help scientists recognize the commercial potential of their research in the first place and then help them to commercialize it effectively.”xxxv It found that men had networks outside traditional academic channels, and were also more likely to use these networks informally to discuss potential ideas and opportunities.

Roughly 49 percent of all publicly traded information technology companies do not have a single woman on their board

However, the importance of a network goes beyond the advisory board. Large and diverse networks play a critical role in being able to capitalize on opportunities, secure initial funding and accelerate professionally. Often these networks are honed through boardroom meetings, speaking engagements, and professional sponsors. Yet, women comprise only 16.9 percent of board memberships in the Fortune 500, 19 percent of Chief Information Officers in the Fortune 250xxxvi and an estimated 10–14 percentxxxvii of speaker positions at tech conferences. Roughly 49 percent of all publicly traded information technology companies do not have a single woman on their board, compared to 36 percent of the largest public companies in the country.xxxviii As board members are usually former CEOs of other tech companies or venture capitalists, this pipeline proves challenging.xxxix

 

The Capital Cycle

Women are also less likely to secure funding compared to their male peers. According to the Center for Venture Research, in the first six months of 2013, only 24 percent of female-led businesses received angel investment and a mere 7 percent received venture capital.xl Investors often invest by “pattern matching” or by looking for startups that have historically proved successful. In Silicon Valley, this often plays out with investors picking entrepreneurs from a traditional cohort where “founders had held a senior position at a big technology firm, worked at a well-connected smaller one, started a successful company already, or attended one of just three universities — Stanford, Harvard and Massachusetts Institute of Technology.”xli In fact, Reuters recently analyzed “Series A” funding given by the top five Silicon Valley venture firms and found that almost 80 percent fit the above description. xlii

Sharon Vosmek, CEO of Astia, a nonprofit focused on getting women into high-growth ventures says, “VCs hold clear stereotypes of successful CEOs. [T]hey call it pattern recognition, but in other industries they call it profiling or stereotyping.”xliii Yet, pattern matching does more than promote the traditional cohort. “The consequence of starting a pattern of white males-only rooms is that patterns tend to repeat themselves — after patterns and norms are well-established, it would take a lot of imagination for some of the boardrooms and lunchrooms in Silicon Valley to try to look or feel drastically different,”xliv observes tech reporter Elise Hu.

One extreme of this is the “brogramming” culture that is beginning to rise in Silicon Valley. Derived from a mash up of the fraternity greeting “bro” and the traditional “programmer”, this culture attracts a more “testosterone-fueled breed of coder,”xlv or one that parties like Sean Parker’s character in the movie The Social Network. This culture increasingly alienates women. “Anything that encourages the perception of tech as being male-dominated is likely to contribute to this decline,” says Sara Chipps, who co-founded Girl Develop It, an organization offering software development programs to women.xlvi

Additionally, investors are likely to miss opportunities based on personal and institutional biases. Debbie Sterling is the founder of GoldiBlox, a toy company established to tackle gender disparities within engineering. She remembers, “My very first investor pitch was a perfect example of this. I presented to two men and one woman. The woman totally got it, and the men didn’t get it at all. They just couldn’t relate to my idea in the way that the woman could.”xlvii Kathryn Minshew, founder of a site dedicated to professional women called The Muse, had a similar experience. “I went into one meeting with a venture partner and he said, 'yeah, I pulled up the site yesterday, but honestly, it just isn't compelling to me at all.’…[I would like to have replied]… 'It doesn't matter that it's not compelling to you. It's not built for you.'”xlviii

This reality is reflected in data as well, in that, “firms with at least one woman investment partner are 70 percent more likely to lead investments in a woman entrepreneur than those with only males.”xlix In general, less diversity in founders means both fewer ideas coming from women and underrepresented groups as well as fewer channels for these groups to become angel investors or venture capitalists themselves, thereby perpetuating the cycle.

It appears that although Silicon Valley prides itself on its ability to laud great ideas and hard work, many have begun to call out the systemic biases for what they really are: The Myth of Meritocracy. After all, with all this glass, it’s almost as if women are the proverbial mimes — stuck in a box.

 

Promising Trends and Solutions

 photo credit:  oh_you ,  CC by 2.0

photo credit: oh_you, CC by 2.0

Luckily, one thing that continues to influence Silicon Valley is numbers, and recent data suggests promising financial and social trends for women:

  • Compared to peers, companies with women in upper management positions reported 35 percent higher return on equity and 34 percent better overall return to shareholders;l

  • Women-led startups are shown to have higher revenue returns, around 12 percent, and they use one-third less capital than their male peers;li

  • The odds of a venture-backed company’s success increase with more female executives at director and VP levels; lii

  • Venture-backed startups that went public, were acquired, or turned profitable were found to have twice as many women in senior roles than their peers, at 7.1 and 3.1 percent respectively.liii

Time to stop fixing the women, and start fixing the innovation ecosystem.

While these financial trends provide cues to venture capitalists and angel investors to seek out women-led startups, they are also being met by positive social trends. Vosmek, in her ten years at Astia, senses the cultural shift as well. “I am excited to see that the conversation has changed dramatically from when I came to Astia [in 2004],” Vosmek affirms. “I find that everyone is asking themselves why they don't see more women in their deal flow [and], at Astia, we are now leading to the next level in the conversation — one that focuses the attention on what we see the opportunity for change to be — rethinking and redesigning the ecosystem. Time to stop fixing the women, and start fixing the innovation ecosystem.liv Vosmek encourages intentional changes that can be measured and replicated throughout the entire ecosystem.

One example of a recent disruption to this ecosystem was the departure of two prominent female Silicon Valley venture capitalists in early 2014. Theresia Gouw and Jennifer Fonstad left their respective firms to found Aspect Ventures, an investment firm specifically targeting mobile startups and diverse teams.lv “There’s tons of data showing that diversity on boards, both public and private, and in management teams, leads to better financial returns,” highlights Gouw.lvi “If you’re a consumer-facing service, half of your audience is going to be male and half of your audience is going to be female.” lvii The creation of Aspect Ventures sends a signal to others in the space: diversity is an asset.

Another disruption to this ecosystem is crowd-funding platforms like Indiegogo and Kickstarter. Danae Ringlemann, the founder of Indiegogo, says the company's goal is to “democratize finance” by giving the power to fund back to the people.lviii One way they do this is by utilizing social networks, an area where women display a clear advantage over men. Women spend roughly 30 percent more time on Facebook, drive 62 percent of the sharing, and have a network that is 8 percent larger than men.lix These networks may prove helpful for crowd-funding. “Communities are really important — almost 30 percent of the founder's overall fundraising goal will come directly from the individual’s personal network,” says Breanna DiGiammarino, Director of Causes for Indiegogo.lx By removing traditional financial barriers, women increase their funding options. The data reinforces this: 47 percent of fully-funded Indiegogo campaigns are run by women, compared to only 13 percent of venture-backed companies.lxi Furthermore, for large-scale and successful campaigns, “Angels and VCs can look to crowd-funding as proof of demand for concepts, and founders can show demand through the success of their campaign,” highlights DiGiammarino.lxii

An additional promising social trend is the number of groups dedicated to women and girls in technology. Dozens of groups around the country like Girls Who Code, Women 2.0, and Black Girls Code aim at increasing coders, building networks, and providing sponsors and mentors. Angie Chang, co-founder of Women 2.0 recalls, “One of the reasons we started Women 2.0 in 2006 was, almost selfishly, to have more women in our networks. Of course, we also wanted to highlight women as creators and allow this conversation to become more mainstream.”lxiii Women 2.0 is now in seven countries and 20 cities, offering monthly online and offline events for female founders to network, learn, and connect. As these groups work to increase the number of coders and networks, dozens of accelerators’ programs like Women Innovate Mobile, NewMe, and Astia aim to increase the number of female entrepreneurs.

For women who are already established in the tech scene, advocating internally proves fruitful as well. After identifying two main constraints around women in tech — unconscious bias and visibility — Megan Smith began to institute a training for 46,000 Googlers in unconscious biases, and began to highlight prominent women in the sector through Women TechMakers.lxiv lxv Sheryl Sandberg, in writing Lean In, sparked an extensive and necessary dialogue around women in the workplace, leading to everything from “Lean In Circles” at the office to nuanced cultural critiques around childcare and patriarchy.

This cultural element may be more deeply rooted than we want to admit. Parents and society encourage young boys to pursue computer science, whereas research finds that girls view it as “boring” or they “don’t think they’d be good at it”.lxvi Chang, a long-time resident of San Francisco, says, “Even in Silicon Valley, parents are still only enrolling their boys in extracurricular coding programs.”lxvii Most recently, in 2011 the affluent school district of Los Altos outside of Silicon Valley began a program to teach over 500 sixth-graders how to code. At that age, the feedback from students showed girls had the same level of interest as boys and that “special girls-only programs [were] unnecessary… because the stereotypes may not have yet set in.”lxviii It appears that if we really want to tackle the gender divide, it may start with us.

 

Will It Make a Difference?

The discussion around “women in tech” is ongoing; however, several prominent themes and recommendations emerge. While this list is not exhaustive, many would agree that in order to increase the representation of women in technology, we must:

  • Recognize prominent female figures in technology at all stages, from historical figures to entrepreneurs to investors;

  • Introduce coding at an early age through school programs and other educational opportunities;

  • Encourage universities to update their CS curricula to increase and support the number of young women interested in pursuing the degree;

  • Expand programs aimed at increasing professional networks, female conference speakers, and board memberships;

  • Address unconscious biases and identify institutionalized norms that prevent diversity from naturally emerging, including male-female sponsorships;

  • Increase the number of female venture capitalists and angel investors; and

  • Continue and join the dialogue around gender norms to create an environment open to ongoing analysis and critique.

While the three decades of trends around women in technology might appear to display a negative feedback loop, the beauty of this engineering term is that it can be, by definition, self-regulating. In fact, just the right amount of intervention can often stabilize the circuit.

Footnotes:

i Cable News Network. "Why Google wants women." CNNMoney. link (accessed February 2, 2014).

ii Cable News Network. "Why Google wants women." CNNMoney. link (accessed February 2, 2014).

iii "By the Numbers | National Center for Women & Information Technology." By the Numbers | National Center for Women & Information Technology. link (accessed March 10, 2014).

iv "Women in IT: The Facts | National Center for Women & Information Technology." Women in IT: The Facts | National Center for Women & Information Technology. link (accessed February 24, 2014).

v "The Culture of Open Source Computing | National Center for Women & Information Technology." The Culture of Open Source Computing | National Center for Women & Information Technology. link (accessed February 24, 2014).

vi Cravens, Amy. “A demographic and business model analysis of today’s app developer.” Application Developers Alliance. link

vii "Women in IT: The Facts | National Center for Women & Information Technology." Women in IT: The Facts | National Center for Women & Information Technology. link (accessed February 24, 2014).

viii 2.0, Women. "Why Women Continue to Lag Behind Men In The Startup Community -- And What We Can Do About It." Forbes. link (accessed February 24, 2014).

ix "Battery Ventures Names First Female General Partner." Venture Capital Dispatch RSS. link (accessed February 24, 2014).

x Stengel, Geri. "How Women Angels And Entrepreneurs Are Beating Investment Odds." Forbes. link (accessed February 24, 2014).

xi "Resources | Women Who Tech." Women Who Tech RSS 092. link (accessed January 7, 2014).

xii "Resources | Women Who Tech." Women Who Tech RSS 092. link (accessed January 7, 2014).

xiii Dryburgh, Heather. "Underrepresentation of Girls and Women in Computer Science: Classification of 1990s Research." Journal of Educational Computing Research 23, no. 2 (2000): 181-202.

xiv Dryburgh, Heather. "Underrepresentation of Girls and Women in Computer Science: Classification of 1990s Research." Journal of Educational Computing Research 23, no. 2 (2000): 181-202.

xv Smith, Megan. "'Passion, Adventure and Heroic Engineering'... and Talent Inclusion." The Huffington Post. link (accessed January 7, 2014).

xvi Ada Lovelace was an English mathematician and is recognized for creating the first algorithm run by a machine; Grace Hopper was an American computer scientist and one of the first programmers at Harvard University; Anita Borg was an American computer scientist who founded the Institute for Women and Technology; and the ENIAC Programmers were a group of six women who were programmers for the first electronic digital computer calculating ballistic -missile projections for World War II.

xvii Miller, Claire. "LeanIn.org and Getty Aim to Change Women’s Portrayal in Stock Photos." The New York Times. link (accessed January 7, 2014).

xviii Miller, Claire. "LeanIn.org and Getty Aim to Change Women’s Portrayal in Stock Photos." The New York Times. link (accessed January 7, 2014).

xix "Opening a Gateway for Girls to Enter the Computer Field." DealBook Opening a Gateway for Girls to Enter the Computer Field Comments. link (accessed March 10, 2014).

xx Pollack, Eileen. "Why Are There Still So Few Women in Science?." The New York Times. link (accessed March 10, 2014).

xxi Kaufman, Wendy. "Addressing The Shortage Of Women In Silicon Valley." NPR. link (accessed February 24, 2014).

xxii Cohoon, J. McGrath. “Harvey Mudd College’s Successful Systemic Approach.” National Center for Women and Information Technology. link

xxiii "How Does Engaging Curriculum Attract Students to Computing? Harvey Mudd College's Successful Systemic Approach (Case Study 2) | National Center for Women & Information Technology." link (accessed March 10, 2014).

xxiv “The Athena Factor: Reversing the Brain Drain in Science, Engineering, and Technology” by Sylvia Ann Hewlett, et al. © 2008 by Harvard Business Publishing

xxv “The Athena Factor: Reversing the Brain Drain in Science, Engineering, and Technology” by Sylvia Ann Hewlett, et al. © 2008 by Harvard Business Publishing

xxvi “The Athena Factor: Reversing the Brain Drain in Science, Engineering, and Technology” by Sylvia Ann Hewlett, et al. © 2008 by Harvard Business Publishing

xxvii Hewlett, Sylvia Ann; Peraino, Kerrie; Sherbin, Laura; and Sumberg, Karen. “The Sponsor Effect: Breaking Through the Last Glass Ceiling.” Center for Work-Life Policy. link

xxviii Hewlett, Sylvia Ann; Peraino, Kerrie; Sherbin, Laura; and Sumberg, Karen. “The Sponsor Effect: Breaking Through the Last Glass Ceiling.” Center for Work-Life Policy.link

xxix 2.0, Women. "Why Women Continue to Lag Behind Men In The Startup Community -- And What We Can Do About It." Forbes. link (accessed February 24, 2014).

xxx Mitchell, Lesa. "OVERCOMING THE GENDER GAP: WOMEN ENTREPRENEURS AS ECONOMIC DRIVERS ." link.(accessed February 22, 2014).

xxxi Mitchell, Lesa. "OVERCOMING THE GENDER GAP: WOMEN ENTREPRENEURS AS ECONOMIC DRIVERS ." link.(accessed February 22, 2014).

xxxii Mitchell, Lesa. "OVERCOMING THE GENDER GAP: WOMEN ENTREPRENEURS AS ECONOMIC DRIVERS ." link.(accessed February 22, 2014).

xxxiii Mitchell, Lesa. "OVERCOMING THE GENDER GAP: WOMEN ENTREPRENEURS AS ECONOMIC DRIVERS ." link.(accessed February 22, 2014).

xxxiv Mitchell, Lesa. "OVERCOMING THE GENDER GAP: WOMEN ENTREPRENEURS AS ECONOMIC DRIVERS ." link.(accessed February 22, 2014).

xxxv Mitchell, Lesa. "OVERCOMING THE GENDER GAP: WOMEN ENTREPRENEURS AS ECONOMIC DRIVERS ." link.(accessed February 22, 2014).

xxxvi "Boardroom Insiders Executive Profiles Blog." F-250 Female Chief Information Officers Approaching 20%. link (accessed March 10, 2014).

xxxvii "Wikia." Geek Feminism Wiki. link (accessed March 10, 2014).

xxxviii Bajaj, Vikas. "A Striking Absence of Women." The New York Times. link (accessed February 27, 2014).

xxxix McBride, Sarah, and Poornima Gupta. "Insight: Tech start-ups show little imagination on board gender diversity." Reuters. link (accessed February 27, 2014).

xl Slade, Hollie. "Why Is It So Hard For Female Entrepreneurs To Get VC Funding? Could Crowdfunding Be The Answer?." Forbes. link (accessed February 24, 2014).

xli McBride, Sarah, and Poornima Gupta. "Insight: Tech start-ups show little imagination on board gender diversity." Reuters. link (accessed February 27, 2014).

xlii McBride, Sarah, and Poornima Gupta. "Insight: Tech start-ups show little imagination on board gender diversity." Reuters. link (accessed February 27, 2014).

xliii Conde Nast Digital. "Silicon Valley Isn’t a Meritocracy. And It’s Dangerous to Hero-Worship Entrepreneurs." Wired.com. link (accessed March 10, 2014).

xliv Hu, Elise. "How The Meritocracy Myth Affects Women In Technology." NPR. link (accessed February 27, 2014).

xlv MacMillan, Douglas. "The Rise of the 'Brogrammer'." Bloomberg Business Week. link (accessed March 10, 2014).

xlvi MacMillan, Douglas. "The Rise of the 'Brogrammer'." Bloomberg Business Week. link (accessed March 10, 2014).

xlvii "The Wall Street Journal." The Accelerators RSS. link (accessed February 27, 2014).

xlviii "The Verge." The Verge. link (accessed February 27, 2014).

xlix “High Performance Entrepreneurs: Women in High Tech.” Illuminate Ventures. link

l "Whitepaper: High Performance Entrepreneurs | Illuminate Ventures - New Thinking in Venture Capital." Illuminate Ventures New Thinking in Venture Capital RSS. link (accessed March 10, 2014).

li “High Performance Entrepreneurs: Women in High Tech.” Illuminate Ventures. link

lii Canning, Jessica; Haque, Maryam; and Wang, Yimeng. “Women at the Wheel: Do Female Executives Drive Start-Up Success?” Dow Jones & Company, Inc. link

liii Canning, Jessica; Haque, Maryam; and Wang, Yimeng. “Women at the Wheel: Do Female Executives Drive Start-Up Success?” Dow Jones & Company, Inc. link

liv Vosmek, Sharon. Interview by author. Email interview. San Francisco, March 9, 2014.

lv "The New York Times." Two of Venture Capital's Senior Women Start a New Firm. link (accessed March 10, 2014).

lvi "Business & Money." Business Money Powerful Female Venture Capitalists Aim to Broaden Silicon Valleys View Comments. link (accessed March 10, 2014).

lvii "Business & Money." Business Money Powerful Female Venture Capitalists Aim to Broaden Silicon Valleys View Comments. link (accessed March 10, 2014).

lviii "VentureBeat." VentureBeat. link (accessed March 10, 2014).

lix Goudreau, Jenna. "What Men And Women Are Doing On Facebook." Forbes. link (accessed March 10, 2014).

lx DiGiammarino, Breanna. Interview by author. Phone interview. San Francisco, March 14, 2006.

lxi 13 percent of companies have one female on their executive team. DiGiammarino, Breanna. Interview by author. Phone interview. San Francisco, March 14, 2006.

lxii DiGiammarino, Breanna. Interview by author. Phone interview. San Francisco, March 14, 2006.

lxiii Chang, Angie. Interview by author. Phone interview. San Francisco, February 11, 2014.

lxiv Cable News Network. "Why Google wants women." CNNMoney. link (accessed February 27, 2014).

lxv Dow Jones & Company. "Bringing Hidden Biases Into the Light." The Wall Street Journal. link (accessed March 10, 2014).

lxvi "How Harvey Mudd Transformed Its Computer Science Program — And Nearly Closed Its Gender Gap." TechCrunch. link (accessed March 10, 2014).

lxvii Chang, Angie. Interview by author. Phone interview. San Francisco, February 11, 2014.

lxviii "Should Kids Learn to Code in Grade School?." MindShift. link (accessed March 10, 2014).


Author Melissa Sandgren is a 2013 graduate of the Harvard Kennedy School of Government who previously worked for UN-Women, Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi and the World Health Organization. She currently lives in San Francisco where she researches how tech can disrupt social norms and promote gender equality. You can find her on Twitter as @mmsandgren.

This article originally appeared in the 2015 issue of the Harvard Kennedy School Review.


 Thanks to GenderAvenger Melissa Sandgren for telling us about her great research!